[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *ping*
- To: Benjy Feen <benjy@feen.com>
- Subject: Re: *ping*
- From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy@tux.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 12:52:24 -0500
- Cc: sage-members@usenix.org
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912310149450.30172-100000@lucien.blight.com>; from Benjy Feen on Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 01:56:35AM -0800
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912310149450.30172-100000@lucien.blight.com>
- Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.ORG
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 01:56:35AM -0800, Benjy Feen wrote:
> So, er, um, how's everyone doing?
>
> Has anyone experienced any Y2K issues in the field more critical than
> "date on man pages may be formatted incorrectly"?
>
> --
> Benjy Feen | benjy@monkeybagel.com | http://www.monkeybagel.com
> --
Elm 2.4*something with MIME/PGP patches shows the year as "100". 2.5.2
doesn't have this bug. Nor can I find the MIME/PGP patches for it. But
the fixes are retroportable and obvious.
And, as you can see, I'm using 'mutt' ...
Critical? I don't know, do you sort important incoming mail
chronologically? ;-)
--
/*********************************************************************\
**
** Joe Yao jsdy@tux.org - Joseph S. D. Yao
**
\*********************************************************************/