[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ping

To: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy@tux.org>, Benjy Feen <benjy@feen.com>
Subject: Re: *ping*
From: "Todd Williams" <todd@mscsoftware.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 11:58:02 -0800
Cc: sage-members@usenix.org
In-Reply-To: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy@tux.org> "Re: *ping*" (Oct 12, 1:12)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912310149450.30172-100000@lucien.blight.com> <20000101125224.A14973@gwyn.tux.org>
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.ORG

On Oct 12,  1:12, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> 
> Elm 2.4*something with MIME/PGP patches shows the year as "100".

Interesting.  The only Y2K problem I've found so far is that Z-Mail 3.2.1
lists incoming mail from Jan 1 2000 as having the date "Oct 11".
I haven't investigated further since this is a minor problem on an
old version of software.  But how it gets Oct 11 from Jan 1 intrigues me...

Todd Williams                                    Manager, IT Business Systems
MSC.Software Corporation,   815 Colorado Boulevard,   Los Angeles, CA   90041
todd.williams@mscsoftware.com                                   (323)259-4973
geek  n. : a carnival performer often billed as a wild man whose act usu.
includes biting the head off a live chicken or snake  -Webster's New Collegiate

Follow-Ups:
- Elm and year 100 (was RE:ping)
  - From: Wim Peeters <wim@sonycom.com>

References:
- Re: *ping*
  - From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy@tux.org>

Prev by Date: RE: *ping*
Next by Date: Re: *ping*
Prev by thread: Re: *ping*
Next by thread: Elm and year 100 (was RE:ping)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: *ping*

Re: ping