[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)

To: sage-members@usenix.org
Subject: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
From: mark@vielle.datasys.net (Mark R. Lindsey)
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 18:08:07 -0500
Reply-To: mark@vielle.datasys.net (Mark R. LIndsey)
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.ORG

I've read that Sun isn't willing to claim that Solaris 2.6 is free of
year-2000-related defects. Has anyone seen anything about 2.6 that would
lead them to think that it does have such a problem?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
  - From: Forrest Houston <fhouston@east.isi.edu>
- Re: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
  - From: Chris <cgreer1@midsouth.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Some cbb y2k info
Next by Date: Re: Personal y2k issue [was: *ping*]
Prev by thread: Netscape 6.5 mail on MS Win98 - Y2K problem?
Next by thread: Re: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread