[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)

To: "Mark R. Lindsey" <mark@vielle.datasys.net>
Subject: Re: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
From: Forrest Houston <fhouston@east.isi.edu>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 19:12:44 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
cc: sage-members@usenix.org
In-Reply-To: <200001022308.SAA25123@vielle.datasys.net>
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.ORG

Out of curiosity where did you read that?  

According to: http://www.sun.com/y2000/enhancements.html

"Solaris operating environments (7, 2.6, 2.5.1, 2.5, 2.4, and 2.3) are
Year 2000 compliant with free modifications available via a download from
SunSolve Online."

Unfortunately I'm not running 2.6 on anything right now, so I can't tell
you if it's giving me any problems or not ;) 

Forrest Houston
USC/ISI East 

On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Mark R. Lindsey wrote:

> I've read that Sun isn't willing to claim that Solaris 2.6 is free of
> year-2000-related defects. Has anyone seen anything about 2.6 that would
> lead them to think that it does have such a problem?
> 
> 
>

References:
- Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
  - From: mark@vielle.datasys.net (Mark R. Lindsey)

Prev by Date: Re: Personal y2k issue [was: *ping*]
Next by Date: Re: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
Prev by thread: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
Next by thread: Re: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread