Re: Solaris 2.6 not y2k ready (?)

[mark@vielle.datasys.net (Mark R. Lindsey)]

It was a while back (>6 months) in some of Sun's printed literature,
I believe. Solaris is such a small part of our operation that I haven't
pursued it further, but it's nice to know that they're willing to speak
for versions <2.6.

Forrest Houston said:
: Out of curiosity where did you read that?  
: 
: According to: http://www.sun.com/y2000/enhancements.html
: 
: "Solaris operating environments (7, 2.6, 2.5.1, 2.5, 2.4, and 2.3) are
: Year 2000 compliant with free modifications available via a download from
: SunSolve Online."
: 
: Unfortunately I'm not running 2.6 on anything right now, so I can't tell
: you if it's giving me any problems or not ;) 
: 
: Forrest Houston
: USC/ISI East 
: 
: On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Mark R. Lindsey wrote:
: 
: > I've read that Sun isn't willing to claim that Solaris 2.6 is free of
: > year-2000-related defects. Has anyone seen anything about 2.6 that would
: > lead them to think that it does have such a problem?
: > 
: > 
: >