[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SAGE] ATT Phones

To: sage-members@usenix.org
Subject: Re: [SAGE] ATT Phones
From: Dave Close <dave@compata.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 07:05:38 -0800
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jan 2004 12:56:33 GMT." <20040107125633.GA22826@globnix.org>
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.org

Phil Pennock wrote:
>I76(PA)/I80(OH)/I90(IA) had solid GSM coverage except in the mountains
>in PA.  Otherwise solid coverage between Philadelphia and Chicago.

I think you mean I90 (IN), Indiana. IA is Iowa.

This discussion might also benefit from the February issue of Consumer
Reports. It evaluates and compares both phones and carriers in various
cities around the US.
-- 
Dave Close, Compata, Costa Mesa CA  "'Always' and 'never' are two
dave@compata.com, +1 714 434 7359    words you should always remember
dhclose@alumni.caltech.edu           never to use." --Wendell Johnson

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SAGE] ATT Phones
  - From: Yves Dorfsman <yves@zioup.com>

References:
- Re: [SAGE] ATT Phones
  - From: Phil Pennock <phil.pennock@globnix.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [SAGE] ATT Phones
Next by Date: Re: [SAGE] ATT Phones
Prev by thread: Re: [SAGE] ATT Phones
Next by thread: Re: [SAGE] ATT Phones
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread