[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SAGE] Are cheap SSL certificates legitimate?

To: "Julian C. Dunn" <jdunn@aquezada.com>
Subject: Re: [SAGE] Are cheap SSL certificates legitimate?
From: "Philip J. Hollenback" <philiph@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:06:17 -0500
Cc: Alexander Lobodzinski <lobo@mental.com>, sage-members@sage.org
In-Reply-To: <20070119135352.E38307@aphrodite.acf.aquezada.com>
References: <9516.1169229868@mental.com> <20070119135352.E38307@aphrodite.acf.aquezada.com>
Reply-To: philiph@pobox.com
Sender: owner-sage-members@usenix.org
User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r655 (Darwin)

On 01/19/07, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
> I think that what the OP is saying is that he doesn't want to make
> every user load a custom root certificate, possibly because of the
> size of his installed base or for other reasons.

Right, it is just too much work to make all users load custom
certificates on their machines, because there are too many platforms
and too many different applications to support.

-- 
Philip J. Hollenback
www.hollenback.net

References:
- Re: [SAGE] Are cheap SSL certificates legitimate?
  - From: Alexander Lobodzinski <lobo@mental.com>
- Re: [SAGE] Are cheap SSL certificates legitimate?
  - From: "Julian C. Dunn" <jdunn@aquezada.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [SAGE] Are cheap SSL certificates legitimate?
Next by Date: Re: [SAGE] Are cheap SSL certificates legitimate?
Prev by thread: Re: [SAGE] Are cheap SSL certificates legitimate?
Next by thread: Re: [SAGE] Are cheap SSL certificates legitimate?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread