[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange

To: Howard Chu <hyc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange
From: David Magda <dmagda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:28:41 -0500
Cc: SAGE mailing list <sage-members@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <47A42358.7040300@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1A6F6DDC-BB0A-498A-914E-76ACF5EE57B5@xxxxxxxx> <p06240800c3c9a4a87a68@[192.168.1.199]> <47A42358.7040300@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: David Magda <dmagda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-sage-members@xxxxxxxxxx


On Feb 2, 2008, at 03:01, Howard Chu wrote:

It amazes me that people can say with a straight face "put a Unix/Linux server in front of it and do the filtering there," tacitlyadmitting how utterly irredeemable the Microsoft platform itselfis, such that it needs an entire separate computer to frontend forit, and yet still using the Microsoft turd in their enterprise.


I think you're preaching to the choir on this list. :)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange
  - From: Jeremiah Johnson

References:
- [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange
  - From: Neil Neely
- Re: [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange
  - From: Brad Knowles
- Re: [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange
  - From: Howard Chu

Prev by Date: Re: [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange
Next by Date: Re: [SAGE] zenoss versus nagios
Previous by thread: Re: [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange
Next by thread: Re: [SAGE] Best Practices for Anti-Virus on Exchange
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread